AP
Language/Comp
Rhetorical
Analysis of Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience”
Directions: Read “Civil Disobedience.” 
As you read, underline examples of Thoreau using rhetorical devices and
identify and explain the devices via annotation.  Answer questions 1-4 to prepare for further
work with a small group.  The group will
work together on questions 5 through 8. 
Be ready to explain your answers to the whole class.  Even when you’re working as a group you
should be writing the answers.
- Based on your reading
     of “Civil Disobedience,” what kind of person does Henry David Thoreau seem
     to be?  How would you characterize
     his state of mind and emotion as he composed this essay?  Cite specific examples from the text to
     support your claims about Thoreau’s voice
     and persona.
 
Voice = textual features such
as diction and syntax, that contribute to a writer’s persona
Persona – the character that a
writer/speaker conveys to the audience
- What does Thoreau do
     in “Civil Disobedience” to urge his readers to believe in him as a trustworthy,
     credible person?  Point out specific
     passages where you felt Thoreau was (or was not) particularly believable
     (this gets at the ethos of the
     piece). Other examples of logos
     or pathos?
 
- One device a writer
     can use to get a point across is metaphor.  Thoreau uses metaphor extensively in
     “Civil Disobedience.”  Notice, for
     example, what he compares machinery to
     or how he uses gaming
     metaphorically.  Select two
     metaphors and explain, citing specific examples from the text, how they
     help Thoreau’s central idea become more vivid for his readers.
 
- How do you think
     Thoreau wanted his readers to react to the essay?  What did he want them to feel? think?
     believe? do?  How do you know?  Identify specific places in the essay
     that help you determine Thoreau’s purpose.
 
- Using the questions
     below, divide the essay into functional parts (a part of text classified
     according to its function—for example, introduction, example, or
     counterargument).  Label the parts
     and be prepared to support your answers.
 
- Is there some
      section that clearly lets the reader know what subject the composition is about and what the writer’s purpose is?  If so, where does this section begin
      and end?  In this section, can you
      find an answer to the central question that the text has been
      written in response to, or can you find an indication of the text’s central argument?
 
- Is there a part that
      explains any background information that the reader needs to know in
      order to be able to understand the answer to the central question
      or argument that the
      composition offers?  If so, where
      does this section begin and end?
 
- Is there some
      sentence or paragraph that focuses the reader’s attention on some
      particular issues, aspect, or theme that the paper examines as opposed to
      others that it could examine?
 
- Is there some
      section that purposefully sets out material in support of the paper’s
      answer to the central question of its argument?  If so, where does this section begin
      and end?
 
- Is there a part that
      examines possible objections to the answer, argument, or supporting
      material?  If so, where does this
      section begin and end?
 
- Is there a sentence
      or section where the writer specifically answers the “So what?”
      question?  In other words, is there
      a section where the writer hints at what he or she hopes readers will
      think and do on the basis of what they have read in the text?
 
- Using a functional
     part where Thoreau is supporting his argument, see how many of the
     following rhetorical methods you can identify.  Cite the paragraph number and a few
     identifying phrases or sentences of specific text to identify the method:
 - Relating anecdotes
 - Describing scenes
      and evoking sensory images
 - Defining terms and
      concepts
 - Dividing the whole
      into parts
 - Classifying the
      parts according to some principle or order
 - Providing
      cause-and-effect reasoning
 
| 
   
Direct Quote and/or
  summary of passage 
Always include page and paragraph number! 
 | 
  
   
Rhetorical device/strategy  including….the appeals; diction (fig lang,
  formal and informal, archaic); syntax (sentence types, sentence and phrasing
  structures)  See pg’s 78,79! 
 | 
  
   
Effect of strategy on the
  reader and on the piece:  What is the
  effect of the strategy on the reader? 
  How does the effect add to the piece as a whole?  Tone and persona comments go here as well. 
 | 
  
   
Purpose of the strategy:  How does the effect help Thoreau achieve
  his overall purpose? 
 | 
 
| 
   | 
  
   | 
  
   | 
  
   | 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment