Possible Sources for Sources
Opinion (Op Ed) pieces from a variety of sources, including newspapers, etc
Reputable newspapers, magazines, television news sources, NPR, CNN, FOX, ABC, etc
Zines
The Lion
Wesley 3 AP American
Research and AP Synthesis Project:
Creating an AP
Synthesis Prompt and Source Packet
Point Value: 100 points
Context: As we continue to read American literature and
anticipate the AP Language and Composition exam, this project merges three
topics of pertinent study: American issues, research, and synthesis. The book is a springboard for talking about
and researching American issues. But we also need to start preparing for the AP
Language and Composition exam’s synthesis essay. This project will help us hone our research
skills, become more aware of a current American issues, and prepare for and
practice writing an AP synthesis essay.
Assignment
Congratulations! The
national AP test writers have nominated this class to write their next
synthesis prompts. Lucky.
BIG TIP! While
writing, use the AP packets (both the source packet and the student essay
packets) to help guide you. These are your models!
In doing this
project, you may work with a partner (of course you don’t have to…I work better
alone). Together, select a current American issue. It might deal with domestic
or foreign policy. If you are having some trouble getting started in
identifying a topic, consider the list below as a starting point. Once you have
a topic, narrow the topic and consider logical angles that create interesting
positions to argue. Then, brainstorm
possible questions that address a SPECIFIC angle on the topic: please note the
example research steps below.
Step one: you choose the topic
(example-- free school lunches).
Step two: this topic is too
generic, but it is a great starting point.
Once you have the topic, begin to create a specific angle that leads to
a clear question (this may take some research and searching)-examples: Free school lunches in high schools; free
school lunches at LT; free school lunches and federal education department.
Step three: formulate your
question—make sure that it is clear and specific—should the federal education department mandate that all schools
provide free lunches? Your question must provoke the STUDENT to take a
stance (the essayist chooses either pro/con)—you DO NOT take a side in
formulating this prompt.
Step four: research this
specific angle and find six sources that directly support or negate this topic.
They must logically connect to your question!
Three sources should more clearly
support one side of the argument (pro) while three other sources should more
clearly support the other side of the argument (con); however, you may also
include one source (in place of one of the other six) which is
neutral/objective and might potentially be used to support either position.
Also, remember that one of your six sources must be a visual source. What is important is that overall your mix of
sources provide balanced support for BOTH sides of the issue, not weak sources
for one side and strong for the other.
Source write-ups: Once
you have selected your six sources, you must do a clear and concise paragraph write
up on each source. Explain which
position (pro, con, objective) you believe the source best supports and why.
These write-ups should be clear and concise: a well-developed paragraph which
immediately states whether the source is best described as pro, con, or neutral,
and then uses embedded quotes, paraphrase, and sound reasoning to explain why
your team believes it best fits the pro, con, or neutral category.
IMPORTANT POINT: Most of the sources
should be non-fiction, with the exception of the visual, which might be
fictional. You may also replace one (but no more than one) of your written
non-fiction pieces with an excerpt from a piece of fiction (e.g., The Great Gatsby) we have read this
year.
Also, please be sure
to label each source as source A-F. This
label should be at the top of the page.
Finally, create an AP
style rubric (1-9 scoring) tailored specifically to your prompt.
Objectives
-Students can
research a topic of interest and select six credible sources
-Students can define
a credible source that is both visual and textual
-Students can
formulate a synthesis question appropriate for their topic that is based on
their AP models. Privilege
Possible broad synthesis topics (only
one per partners!): We will not do gun control or abortion as topics, not
because they aren’t legitimate issues, but for the simple reason that they have
been done more than any other topics.
- Health care
- Religious
discrimination/profiling
- minimum wage
- foreign policy
- prison
sentencing and race
- drug laws
- racial/ethnic
profiling
- Snowden—Patriot
or Leaker?
- Personal privacy
vs. surveillance and security
- Standardized testing
- College admissions
- College tuition
- Policing issues
- Affirmative Action
- Gay Rights/equality/social justice
- Tax policy
- Education funding
- Gender issues
- Housing issues
- Nutrition
- Poverty
- Shrinking middle class
- Economic growth
- Mental health/illness issues
- Minimum Wage
- Disabilities
- Environmental issues
- Any thing else that is relevant
Final product:
You will have a cover
page that contextualizes the topic and contains the synthesizing prompt.
You will have six
sources—one source per page.
You will create an
AP-style rubric (scored on 1-9 scale) for your prompt.
Attached as an
appendix, you will submit a pro, con, objective write-ups for each source.
This synthesis packet
will be used by your peers to produce an in class synthesis essay that
addresses your prompt.
Deadlines: See calendar below.
2/29
Introduce AP Research/Synthesis Essay project
Read in Cliff’s AP: Types of Essays Topics,
Synthesis (Page 29)
The Synthesis Essay (background and example):
39-52
|
3/1
Read and review one more AP synthesis essay (2014
and 2011)
Meet with team to discuss your project plan;
Work on creating prompt
Discuss places where you might find good sources
HW: Begin looking for sources
|
3/2
See/Review student responses to synthesis essay
(2014)
Work on creating prompt
Review AP rubric
HW: Look for sources and consider how you would
excerpt those sources (and create draft source write-ups)
|
3/3
Research Day – Continue finding sources and doing
source write-ups
DC – prd 2 & 3
L ib E – prd 4
|
3/4
Research
Day
Library
B: Prd 2-4
Due
today (visual check) 1st
draft of chosen and excerpted
sources, bibliographic entries for sources, source write-ups
|
3/7
CASIMIR PULASKI DAY
*or weather make-up day
|
3/8
Research Day
Prd 2, 3, 4 – in Lib E
1st draft of Completed Rubric
|
3/9
Late
Start Day
2nd draft due: Nearly Final
Peer Group Read-through for edits
Research Day (Prds 2-3 in Lib B)
Prd 4 in Lib E
|
3/10
TBA
|
3/11
QUARTER 3 END
Final Project Due
Synthesis Projects Due as Word
Document and Hard Copy
|
Grading: 100 points Student
Names: _________________________________
AP Synthesis Project Rubric:
A (8-9) The
prompt is mature, meaningful, and well-written, providing a compelling and
debatable American issue. The prompt is supported by a balanced (pro, con,
neutral) mix of polished, very well-chosen/written, and properly cited (MLA)
source documents. Conventions and formatting of the entire packet is
all-but-perfect and it is combined into one Word document. The rubric is
tailored to the prompt, well-worded and free of errors. The sources chosen are
balanced and supported by thoughtful, thorough, fair, and well-written
write-ups appended to the end of the assignment. The entire package is
essentially ready for printing and use as an AP exam quality prompt.
B (6-7) Though
perhaps not quite as mature, meaningful, and/or well-written as the best
prompts and sources, the document provides a legitimate and debatable American
issue. The prompt is supported by a balanced (pro-con) mix of fairly
well-chosen/well-written sources, though they might not be as apt in selection
or well-written as those found in the best document packets. The source
documents are properly cited (MLA). Conventions and formatting is
all-but-perfect, and the packet is combined into one Word document. The rubric
is tailored to the prompt, fairly well-worded and free of errors. Though they
do not necessarily reveal the quality of analysis or polished writing found in
the best write-ups, these write-up are good, reasonable, and balanced and they
clearly convey why the source falls into the category it fits into. While not
yet an AP quality prompt, with some improvements to question, content and
formatting, it could be.
C (5) They demonstrate an attempt to create a AP exam
style synthesis prompt and packet, but it may have a vague or less compelling
prompt and/or have mediocre or unbalanced source content. Source write-ups are
adequate but the explanations are not especially precise, insightful,
well-written. Alternatively, they may be relatively strong in terms of prompt
and source content but are poorly formatted, contain typos, or have other
distracting errors. The rubric is generic (not tailored specifically to that
prompt) or in some other way is adequate at best.
D (3-4) They are deficient in prompt, source content,
formatting, rubric or source write-ups.
F (1-2) They
are realllllyyyy deficicient!
No comments:
Post a Comment